From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932356AbWGFL1s (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:27:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932409AbWGFL1s (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:27:48 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([213.239.205.147]:10883 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932356AbWGFL1r (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:27:47 -0400 Subject: Re: AVR32 architecture patch against Linux 2.6.18-rc1 available From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Haavard Skinnemoen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20060706120319.26b35798@cad-250-152.norway.atmel.com> References: <20060706105227.220565f8@cad-250-152.norway.atmel.com> <20060706021906.1af7ffa3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060706120319.26b35798@cad-250-152.norway.atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:30:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1152185425.24611.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 12:03 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > Looks pretty sane from a quick scan. > > > > - request_irq() can use GFP_KERNEL? > > Probably, but the genirq implementation also uses GFP_ATOMIC. Is there a good reason, why AVR32 needs its own interrupt handling implementation ? >>From a short glance there's nothing which can not be handled by the generic code. Also there are a couple of things missing -e.g. recursive enable/disable_irq() handling. tglx