From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750953AbWGHHfV (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:35:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751024AbWGHHfV (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:35:21 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:39587 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750901AbWGHHfU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:35:20 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty? From: Mike Galbraith To: Jon Smirl Cc: lkml , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <9e4733910607071956q284a2173rfcdb2cfe4efb62b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e4733910607071956q284a2173rfcdb2cfe4efb62b4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:40:52 +0200 Message-Id: <1152344452.7922.11.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 22:56 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > Does anyone use the info in /proc/tty? The hard coded device names > aren't compatible with udev's ability to rename things. > > There also doesn't appear to be any useful info in the drivers portion > that isn't already available in sysfs. I can add some code to make a > list of registered line disciplines appear in sysfs. > > Does anyone have a problem with deleting /proc/tty if ldisc enum > support is added to sysfs? ps uses /proc/tty/drivers, so some coordination would be needed. -Mike