From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030417AbWGHWzK (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030413AbWGHWzJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:55:09 -0400 Received: from 142.163.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.163.142]:6600 "EHLO idefix.homelinux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030415AbWGHWzH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:55:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Suspend to RAM regression tracked down From: Jean-Marc Valin To: Dave Jones Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Linux Kernel , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20060708062345.GB3356@redhat.com> References: <1151837268.5358.10.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <44A80B20.1090702@goop.org> <1152271537.5163.4.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <20060707162152.GB3223@redhat.com> <1152312530.14453.16.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <20060708062345.GB3356@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E9?= de Sherbrooke Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 08:55:02 +1000 Message-Id: <1152399303.14453.29.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If you're prepared to play around with 'git bisect' a little, it shouldn't > take that many iterations, as you've already narrowed it down quite a lot. > > $ git bisect start drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > $ git bisect bad > $ git bisect good v2.6.12-rc5 > > should get you most of the way there. > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-bisect.html > has more info. Could you give me a bit more info, since I've never used git before (I only downloaded the git snapshots)? Also, if I understand correctly, cpufreq_ondemand.c is the only file that could cause the problem. Is that right? Also, is it possible to use an old version of it on a new kernel? Jean-Marc