From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161046AbWGJMxc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:53:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161053AbWGJMxb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:53:31 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:37825 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161046AbWGJMxW (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:53:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] -Wshadow: Making the kernel build clean with -Wshadow From: Arjan van de Ven To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <9a8748490607100548o14dbe684j40bde90eb19a7558@mail.gmail.com> References: <9a8748490607100548o14dbe684j40bde90eb19a7558@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:53:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1152535999.4874.36.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So, what do people say? Hi, I'm just about always in favor of having automated tools help us find bugs. However... can you give an indication of how many real bugs you have encountered? If it's "mostly noise" all the time.. then it's maybe not worth the effort... while if you find real bugs then it's obviously worthwhile to go through this. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven