From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030231AbWGKHHa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:07:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030318AbWGKHH3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:07:29 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:19611 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030231AbWGKHH3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:07:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Document that sys_sysctl will be removed. From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060710155051.326e49da.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:07:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1152601640.3128.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The comment about kernel.version is odd. That information is available in > uname so I can't imagine why sys_sysctl would be an interesting source. glibc used it (pass tense); sometimes it's better to not ask why ;)