From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
vgoyal@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] stack overflow safe kdump (2.6.18-rc1-i386) - safe_smp_processor_id
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:36:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152621374.3575.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18xn0lsdq.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 21:42 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> But I do agree the subarch header files are clean.
> And no this case except for the fact no one realized that the
> code doesn't even compile on voyager does not show how brittle
> the x86 subarch code is. Except for the fact that it seems
> obvious that kernel/smp.c is generic code that every smp subarch
> would use.
OK ... that's the mistaken assumption. kernel/smp.c is not subarch
generic, it's APIC specific. So all apic using subarchs, which is
pretty much everything except voyager, use it. Since voyager uses
vic/qic based smp harness, it has its own version of this file (in fact
voyager has a completely separate SMP HAL).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 7:50 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-10 8:27 ` [Fastboot] " Keith Owens
2006-07-10 10:15 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-10 11:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11 4:21 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-11 4:44 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-11 4:55 ` Keith Owens
2006-07-11 6:15 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-11 6:25 ` Keith Owens
2006-07-10 12:04 ` Keith Owens
2006-07-11 6:40 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2006-07-10 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-10 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-10 20:58 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-11 3:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11 12:36 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2006-07-11 19:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11 6:21 ` [Fastboot] " Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152621374.3575.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®