From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750980AbWGKNOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750964AbWGKNOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:14:43 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:53896 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750747AbWGKNOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:14:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andi Kleen Cc: Joachim Deguara , Mark Langsdorf , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: <200607111507.39079.ak@suse.de> References: <1152622554.4489.32.camel@lapdog.site> <200607111507.39079.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:14:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1152623675.3128.41.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > The only way to possibly make the concept work would be regular TSC resyncs > during runtime, but I think I would prefer using per CPU TSC offsets > using RDTSCP instead because they should be able to tolerate arbitary > shifts. if you have per cpu offset and speed, then you don't even need to tie all frequencies together... sounds like the best solution to me..