From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751121AbWGKQDl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:03:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751128AbWGKQDl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:03:41 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:28830 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751121AbWGKQDk (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:03:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step? From: Alan Cox To: Olaf Hering Cc: Theodore Tso , "H. Peter Anvin" , Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, klibc@zytor.com, torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20060711151347.GA15625@suse.de> References: <20060711044834.GA11694@suse.de> <20060711134554.GC24029@thunk.org> <20060711151347.GA15625@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:21:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1152634884.18028.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 17:13 +0200, ysgrifennodd Olaf Hering: > On Tue, Jul 11, Theodore Tso wrote: > > Was RHEL4 designed for 2.6? RHEL4 is 2.6.9 based, with a lot of bugs then fixed.