From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750735AbWGKQYH@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750735AbWGKQYH (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:24:07 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751018AbWGKQYG
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:24:06 -0400
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:5528 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750735AbWGKQYF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:24:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: andrea@cpushare.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060711161311.GK7192@opteron.random>
References: <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <20060630014050.GI19712@stusta.de> <20060630045228.GA14677@opteron.random>
	 <20060630094753.GA14603@elte.hu> <20060630145825.GA10667@opteron.random>
	 <20060711073625.GA4722@elte.hu> <20060711141709.GE7192@opteron.random>
	 <1152628374.3128.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20060711153117.GJ7192@opteron.random>
	 <1152633242.3128.81.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20060711161311.GK7192@opteron.random>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:23:52 +0200
Message-Id: <1152635032.3128.89.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <arjan@infradead.org> by pentafluge.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 18:13 +0200, andrea@cpushare.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:54:02PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Ehm I wasn't aware all linux vendors in the world owe that to you, or
> > that you own their kernel configuration
> 
> I perfectly know nobody owes anything to me, I said I didn't expect it
> because it sounds very weird having to take an anti-fedora position in a
> project like CPUShare. 

it sounds very weird taking an anti-fedora position without even having
asked Fedora to turn it on. But maybe that's just me.