From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751081AbWGKQI5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:08:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751107AbWGKQI5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:08:57 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:61379 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081AbWGKQI4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:08:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n From: Alan Cox To: andrea@cpushare.com Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <20060711153117.GJ7192@opteron.random> References: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> <20060630014050.GI19712@stusta.de> <20060630045228.GA14677@opteron.random> <20060630094753.GA14603@elte.hu> <20060630145825.GA10667@opteron.random> <20060711073625.GA4722@elte.hu> <20060711141709.GE7192@opteron.random> <1152628374.3128.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060711153117.GJ7192@opteron.random> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:24:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1152635055.18028.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 17:31 +0200, ysgrifennodd andrea@cpushare.com: > If they don't reconsider I'll be forced to recommend the Fedora CPUShare > users to switch distro if they don't want having to recompile the kernel > by themself. I'm sure they'll both be deeply upset. I really don't care about cpushare and patents for some users of the code in question. On the other hand turning on performance harming code for a tiny number of users is dumb. If it were a loadable module it would be different. Alan