From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751069AbWGKQlY@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751069AbWGKQlY (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751076AbWGKQlY
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:24 -0400
Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:28106 "EHLO
	lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751069AbWGKQlX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: andrea@cpushare.com
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060711161311.GK7192@opteron.random>
References: <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <20060630014050.GI19712@stusta.de> <20060630045228.GA14677@opteron.random>
	 <20060630094753.GA14603@elte.hu> <20060630145825.GA10667@opteron.random>
	 <20060711073625.GA4722@elte.hu> <20060711141709.GE7192@opteron.random>
	 <1152628374.3128.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20060711153117.GJ7192@opteron.random>
	 <1152633242.3128.81.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20060711161311.GK7192@opteron.random>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:57:02 +0100
Message-Id: <1152637022.18028.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 18:13 +0200, ysgrifennodd andrea@cpushare.com:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:54:02PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Aren't Ingo and Alan Fedora? If they ask N in the main kernel, and they
> already set it to N in fedora I'm unsure what I should discuss further
> with them.

Neither of us are the ones who set the final options for Fedora kernels,
although I'd be suprised given the minisclue user base and the added
cost to every user if anyone else reached a differing conclusion, but
that is for the Fedora Project to decide not for me.