From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932434AbWGLFfG (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:35:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751321AbWGLFfF (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:35:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:26335 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751168AbWGLFfE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:35:04 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: Runnable threads on run queue From: Mike Galbraith To: Ask List Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1152429626.9711.34.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 07:40:56 +0200 Message-Id: <1152682856.9689.16.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 04:14 +0000, Ask List wrote: > Network Problem? So your saying our mail servers are not sending spam traffic > fast enough if spam assassin processes are running out of work to do? So when > our mail servers are not sending spam traffic we see our cpu,cs,interrupts, & > runnable threads drop ...? More or less, yes. I think somebody is dropping the communication ball. -Mike