From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945910AbWGNXat (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:30:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945914AbWGNXat (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:30:49 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:52123 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945910AbWGNXas (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:30:48 -0400 Subject: Re: 18rc1 soft lockup From: john stultz To: Dave Jones Cc: Roman Zippel , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20060714140952.GD667@redhat.com> References: <20060711190346.GK5362@redhat.com> <1152645227.760.9.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060711191658.GM5362@redhat.com> <20060713220722.GA3371@redhat.com> <1152828943.6845.107.camel@localhost> <20060713222830.GC3371@redhat.com> <20060714140952.GD667@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:30:38 -0700 Message-Id: <1152919839.8885.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 10:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:22:47AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:15:43PM -0700, john stultz wrote: > > > > > > > > Just when I thought it had gotten fixed.. > > > > > 2.6.18rc1-git6 this time on x86-64.. > > > > > > > > > > BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3! > > > > > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > [] show_trace+0xaa/0x23d > > > > > [] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 > > > > > [] softlockup_tick+0xd5/0xea > > > > > [] run_local_timers+0x13/0x15 > > > > > [] update_process_times+0x4c/0x79 > > > > > [] smp_local_timer_interrupt+0x2b/0x50 > > > > > [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x58/0x62 > > > > > [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70 > > > > > > > > Hmmm.. grumble. Was this on bootup, or after some time period? > > > > > > Right at the end of boot up, between the switch from runlevel 3 to 5. > > > > When it waits, a SysRq+T might be useful. > > it doesn't wait. this scrolls by within a split second. Huh. I wonder if the x86-64 lost-tick compensation code is being triggered. Could you boot w/ "report_lost_ticks" and see if it spits anything out right before this? thanks -john