From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750705AbWGQJ07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:26:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750719AbWGQJ07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:26:59 -0400 Received: from [216.208.38.107] ([216.208.38.107]:32384 "EHLO OTTLS.pngxnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750705AbWGQJ06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:26:58 -0400 Subject: Re: Reiser4 Inclusion From: Arjan van de Ven To: Caleb Gray Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44BAFDB7.9050203@calebgray.com> References: <44BAFDB7.9050203@calebgray.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:25:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1153128374.3062.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 20:02 -0700, Caleb Gray wrote: > Dear Linux Kernel Developers, > > I would like to express my experiences with the reiser4 filesystem and > my reasons for its readiness to be officially included in the Linux kernel. Hi, may I ask why you are sending this? Have you done code audits to the code? Have you done anything that was on the "these need fixing before it can go in" list? If not, aren't you just doing campaigning on non-technical grounds? And isn't that a bad idea? Arjan van de Ven -- who is starting to smell a directed PR campaign leading to allergic reactions