From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750748AbWGRBsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:48:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750752AbWGRBsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:48:13 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:11696 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbWGRBsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:48:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix bad macro param in timer.c (was: kernel/timer.c: next_timer_interrupt() strange/buggy(?) code (2.6.18-rc1-mm2)) From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keir@xensource.com, Tony Lindgren , zach@vmware.com, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andreas Mohr In-Reply-To: <20060717185330.GA32264@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> References: <20060717185330.GA32264@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:47:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1153187268.9932.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 20:53 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi all, > > next_timer_interrupt() contains the following gem: > > /* Check tv2-tv5. */ > varray[0] = &base->tv2; > varray[1] = &base->tv3; > varray[2] = &base->tv4; > varray[3] = &base->tv5; > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > j = INDEX(i); > do { > if (list_empty(varray[i]->vec + j)) { > j = (j + 1) & TVN_MASK; > continue; > } > list_for_each_entry(nte, varray[i]->vec + j, entry) > if (time_before(nte->expires, expires)) > expires = nte->expires; > if (j < (INDEX(i)) && i < 3) Looking at what INDEX is defined to be: #define INDEX(N) (base->timer_jiffies >> (TVR_BITS + N * TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK > list = varray[i + 1]->vec + (INDEX(i + 1)); And this INDEX(i+1) is now a ... (TVR_BITS + i + 1 * TVN_BITS)) ... This doesn't quite look like it suppose to be that way. Probably having some funny results because of it. Here's the patch to clean up the macro used to find the index of the timer vector. This is definitely a bug fix and should go into 2.6.18 -- Steve Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/timer.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.18-rc2.orig/kernel/timer.c 2006-07-17 21:34:08.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/timer.c 2006-07-17 21:34:22.000000000 -0400 @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int cascade(tvec_base_t *base, tv * This function cascades all vectors and executes all expired timer * vectors. */ -#define INDEX(N) (base->timer_jiffies >> (TVR_BITS + N * TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK +#define INDEX(N) (base->timer_jiffies >> (TVR_BITS + (N) * TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK static inline void __run_timers(tvec_base_t *base) {