From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932174AbWGXOZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:25:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932188AbWGXOZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:25:19 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]:64464 "EHLO ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932174AbWGXOZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:25:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add maintainer for memory management From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <1153749795.23798.19.camel@lappy> References: <1153713707.4002.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1153749795.23798.19.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:25:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1153751108.4002.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 16:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi Steven, > > The way I understand the maintainership of the memory management code is > as follows: there is explicitly no maintainer listed. This code is so > sensitive and has interactions with so many other sub-systems that it > would not be doable to look at it from all possible angles by only one > person. > > As it stands its more a group of people headed by Linus, Andrew and > Hugh. > Thanks Peter for the explanation. So, I'll send another patch to just add the linux-mm mailing list, since that should have no qualms about it. Thanks, -- Steve