From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751427AbWGXUAe (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:00:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751429AbWGXUAd (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:00:33 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:5506 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427AbWGXUAd (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:00:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.18rc2] [1/7] i386/x86-64: Don't randomize stack top when no randomization personality is set From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andi Kleen Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44c514a8.6HlRR82y133O2bd0%ak@suse.de> References: <44c514a8.6HlRR82y133O2bd0%ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:00:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1153771226.3043.91.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > - if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) { > + if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) && > + !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) { these should be exclusive anyway, isn't the right solution to clear PF_RANDOMIZE on ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE personality ?