From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932474AbWGYFe5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:34:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932476AbWGYFe5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:34:57 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:28035 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932474AbWGYFe4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:34:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate pktcdvd natural device hierarchy From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andrew Morton Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, petero2@telia.com, Laurent Riffard In-Reply-To: <20060724192718.547a836e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <448875D1.5080905@free.fr> <448D84C0.1070400@linux.intel.com> <1151000451.3120.56.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1152884770.3159.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1152947098.3114.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <44B8C506.1000009@free.fr> <44BA1609.9050305@free.fr> <20060724192718.547a836e.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:34:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1153805684.8932.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 19:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:33:45 +0200 > Arjan, do we still need > lockdep-annotate-pktcdvd-natural-device-hierarchy.patch? yes afaics > And could you please take a look at Peter's block_dev.c changes? Closely, > please - it'd be nice to get this right one of these days ;) I'm not too happy about them; they use the partition uglies for something which is not a partition; the uglyness should stop not spread... while the patch probably is effective in shutting lockdep up it's not really the right approach. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com