From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030410AbWGZGdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:33:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030411AbWGZGdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:33:31 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:15586 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030410AbWGZGda (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:33:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Zach Brown , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: <20060726062647.GA8711@mellanox.co.il> References: <20060704115656.GA1539@elte.hu> <20060726062647.GA8711@mellanox.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:33:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1153895599.2896.4.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Ingo, does the following look good to you? > > Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled. Hi, can you tell us what this fixes? Eg is there a specific problem? I mean... we're adding ifdefs so there better be a real good reason for them.... fixing something real would be such a reason ;-) Greetings, Arjan van de Ven