From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750957AbWG0RPW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750963AbWG0RPW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:22 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:38302 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750957AbWG0RPV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 From: Alan Cox To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:33:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1154021616.13509.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Iau, 2006-07-27 am 20:05 +0300, ysgrifennodd Pekka J Enberg: > Sure. Though I wonder if sys_frevoke is enough for us and we can drop > sys_revoke completely. Alas not. Some Unix devices have side effects when you open() them.