From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Next 2.6.17-stable review cycle will be starting in about 24 hours
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:25:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154687108.3905.92.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17618.39572.764990.76181@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Hi Neil,
> > > > This is a heads up that the next 2.6.17-stable review cycle will be
> > > > starting in about 24 hours. I've caught up on all pending -stable
> > > > patches that I know about and placed them in our queue, which can be
> > > > browsed online at:
> > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=tree;f=queue-2.6.17
> > > >
> > > > If anyone sees that this queue is missing something that they feel
> > > > should get into the next 2.6.17-stable release, please let us know at
> > > > stable@kernel.org within the next 24 hours or so.
> > >
> > > instead of ext3-avoid-triggering-ext3_error-on-bad-nfs-file-handle.patch
> > > it makes more sense to include the revised patches from Neil:
> > >
> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/430323
> > >
> > > It seems that these are not merged upstream, but my understanding was
> > > that they were the best way to fix this. For RHEL4 we are going with
> > > these two patches.
> >
> > Hm, I just went with what Neil sent me for inclusion. Neil, do you want
> > me to change the patches you sent us?
>
> I think the patch you have is adequate for ext3. It closes the
> important hole. I think the extra patch for ext3 in the gmane link
> above is not entirely necessary so I wouldn't push it for stable.
> That doesn't make it a wrong choice for RHEL4 though.
>
> The ext2 patch, on the other hand, should probably go in to stable.
this actually looks unclean to me. I thought the code duplication in
ext2 and ext3 was the price that you have to pay to avoid any layering
violation. I personally would like to see the upstream patch go into
-stable. However we don't have this upstream at the moment. So what
would you consider sending to Linus?
Regards
Marcel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 7:48 Greg KH
2006-08-03 16:47 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-08-03 17:00 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2006-08-04 0:53 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-04 5:41 ` Greg KH
2006-08-04 10:25 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154687108.3905.92.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®