From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mismatch between hdaprm and sdparm output
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154911344.3054.153.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23691.1154910746@ocs3.ocs.com.au>
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:32 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> NEC Versa S5200 laptop with FUJITSU MHV2080B SATA disk. Kernel
> 2.6.16.21-0.13-smp (suselinux 10.1) using ata_piix. hdparm and sdparm
> give inconsistent results, which one should I believe? My main concern
> is write caching (XFS filesystem).
well write caching you should be able to benchmark easily.. does, say,
dbench or tiobench show any difference ?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-07 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 0:32 Keith Owens
2006-08-07 0:42 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154911344.3054.153.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®