mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:26:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155050817.19249.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D865FD.1040806@sw.ru>

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 14:22 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> sys_getppid() optimization can access a freed memory.
> On kernels with DEBUG_SLAB turned ON, this results in
> Oops.
...
> +#else
> +	/*
> +	 * ->real_parent could be released before dereference and
> +	 * we accessed freed kernel memory, which faults with debugging on.
> +	 * Keep it simple and stupid.
> +	 */
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	pid = current->group_leader->real_parent->tgid;
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +#endif
>  	return pid;
>  }

Accessing freed memory is a bug, always, not just *only* when slab
debugging is on, right?  Doesn't this mean we could get junk, or that
the reader could potentially run off a bad pointer?

It seems that this patch only papers over the problem in the case when
it is observed, but doesn't really even fix the normal case.

Could we use a seqlock to determine when real_parent is in flux, and
re-read real_parent until we get a consistent one?  We could use in in
lieu of the existing for() loop.

-- Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-08 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-08 10:22 Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 15:26 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2006-08-08 15:34   ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-08-08 15:41     ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-08 15:43   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 15:49     ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-08 15:54       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 15:58       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-08-09  3:09     ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-09  3:31       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1155050817.19249.42.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dev@sw.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome