From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751118AbWHPMeT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751118AbWHPMeT (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:34:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751155AbWHPMeT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:34:19 -0400
Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:14767 "HELO
	pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1751118AbWHPMeS (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:34:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Use suspend_console in swsusp and make it
	configureable
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linux PM <linux-pm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060816104143.GC9497@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <200608151509.06087.rjw@sisk.pl>
	 <20060816104143.GC9497@elf.ucw.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:34:42 +1000
Message-Id: <1155731682.4433.2.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi.

On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:41 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I do not think that is enough. "(WILL TRASH YOUR CMOS)" would be more

But 'trash your cmos' says too much. 'Trash your cmos clock' might be
better.

Regards,

Nigel