From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frank v Waveren <fvw@var.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 20:41:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157222493.29250.383.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060901201305.f01ec7d2.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:13 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Fun, here is a version with a bigabyte blocker.
>
> Your patch triggers waaaaaaay early.
>
> netconsole: remote IP 192.168.2.33
> netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:0d:56:c6:c6:cc
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> time.c: Using 14.318180 MHz WALL HPET GTOD HPET/TSC timer.
> time.c: Detected 3400.238 MHz processor.
> ktime_set: -1157140842 : 0
-------------^ !!!!!!!
> BUG: warning at include/linux/ktime.h:84/ktime_set()
>
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff80247021>] hrtimer_run_queues+0x10e/0x211
This seems to happen inside hrtimer_get_softirq_time().
wall_to_monotonic is negative.
Why does the check trigger ? We compare a "long", which contains a
negative value against some positive constant.
ktime_t ktime_set(const long secs, const unsigned long nsecs)
{
if (unlikely(secs >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)) {
where KTIME_SEC_MAX is 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / 1000 000 000 =
9223372036 == 0x225C17D04,
which is compared against
-1157140842 == 0xFFFFFFFFBB076E96
This smells like gcc magic. Can you please disassemble the code in
question ?
> I wonder if this is related to the occasional hrtimr_run_queues() lockup
> which Andi is encountering.
Hmm, not sure.
tglx
--
VGER BF report: H 1.60283e-12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-02 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 8:44 Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 21:44 ` Frank v Waveren
2006-08-30 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 22:08 ` Frank v Waveren
2006-08-30 22:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 22:26 ` Frank v Waveren
2006-09-01 3:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 8:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-01 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-02 3:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 3:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 8:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-02 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-09-02 19:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-02 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 11:04 ` Frank v Waveren
2006-09-02 18:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-03 3:13 ` Frank v Waveren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157222493.29250.383.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=fvw@var.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®