mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frank v Waveren <fvw@var.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 20:41:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157222493.29250.383.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060901201305.f01ec7d2.akpm@osdl.org>

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:13 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Fun, here is a version with a bigabyte blocker.
> 
> Your patch triggers waaaaaaay early.
> 
> netconsole: remote IP 192.168.2.33
> netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:0d:56:c6:c6:cc
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> time.c: Using 14.318180 MHz WALL HPET GTOD HPET/TSC timer.
> time.c: Detected 3400.238 MHz processor.
> ktime_set: -1157140842 : 0

-------------^   !!!!!!!

> BUG: warning at include/linux/ktime.h:84/ktime_set()
> 
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ> [<ffffffff80247021>] hrtimer_run_queues+0x10e/0x211

This seems to happen inside hrtimer_get_softirq_time().
wall_to_monotonic is negative.

Why does the check trigger ? We compare a "long", which contains a
negative value against some positive constant. 

ktime_t ktime_set(const long secs, const unsigned long nsecs)
{
	if (unlikely(secs >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)) {

where KTIME_SEC_MAX is 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF / 1000 000 000 = 

9223372036 == 0x225C17D04,

which is compared against 

-1157140842 == 0xFFFFFFFFBB076E96

This smells like gcc magic. Can you please disassemble the code in
question ?

> I wonder if this is related to the occasional hrtimr_run_queues() lockup
> which Andi is encountering.

Hmm, not sure.

	tglx



-- 
VGER BF report: H 1.60283e-12

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-02 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-30  8:44 Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 21:44 ` Frank v Waveren
2006-08-30 22:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 22:08     ` Frank v Waveren
2006-08-30 22:22       ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-30 22:26         ` Frank v Waveren
2006-09-01  3:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01  8:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-01  9:04     ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01  9:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-02  3:13         ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02  3:32           ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02  8:08           ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-02 18:41           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-09-02 19:28             ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-02 19:43               ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 19:32             ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 11:04   ` Frank v Waveren
2006-09-02 18:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-03  3:13       ` Frank v Waveren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1157222493.29250.383.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=fvw@var.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®