From: Piet Delaney <piet@bluelane.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Piet Delaney <piet@bluelane.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:20:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157610028.14930.32.camel@piet2.bluelane.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1pse8vjjg.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1662 bytes --]
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 14:15 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all
> >> of the serious problems have been worked through. So it
> >> is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental
> > (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers
> > that still break)
>
> That is a reasonable viewpoint. Although by that a lot more of the kernel
> deserves to be marked experimental.
>
> On the perverse side of the sentiment taking off experimental may increase
> our number of testers and get the bugs fixed faster :)
I take it that for using kexec to boot a kdump kernel and then
rebooting the primary kernel that there are a few drivers in
the dumping kernel that wouldn't work but they aren't likely
to be used. Ie: it's "just" a hardware initialization issue
on kernels booted with kexec.
-piet
>
> > But applied for now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Eric
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Piet Delaney Phone: (408) 200-5256
Blue Lane Technologies Fax: (408) 200-5299
10450 Bubb Rd.
Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Email: piet@bluelane.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-06 16:42 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 19:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-06 20:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 6:20 ` Piet Delaney [this message]
2006-09-07 6:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-08 1:54 ` Piet Delaney
2006-09-07 5:47 ` Piet Delaney
2006-09-07 6:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157610028.14930.32.camel@piet2.bluelane.com \
--to=piet@bluelane.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome