From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932339AbWIZQLy (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:11:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932338AbWIZQLn (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:11:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:19604 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932337AbWIZQLl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:11:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [SYSFS] Add a declaration for fs_subsys From: Steven Whitehouse To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060926160043.GA2402@infradead.org> References: <1159274711.11901.460.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <20060926160043.GA2402@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat (UK) Ltd Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:18:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1159287488.11901.514.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 17:00 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:45:11PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > > > The fs_subsys of sysfs does not have a declaration in any header > > file, despite it being an exported symbol. This patch adds one so > > that modules don't have to add their own. This is something used > > by GFS2 (and already in the GFS2 tree) but I think can safely be > > considered generic infrastructure. > > The declaration seem to be already present in Linus' current tree. > Oops. Sorry, I'd totally missed that. I've backed out the second declaration from the GFS2 tree, Steve.