From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932307AbWIZUzM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:55:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932308AbWIZUzM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:55:12 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:20445 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932307AbWIZUzL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:55:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: use our IRQ defines From: Alan Cox To: Olivier Galibert Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060926204433.GA77171@dspnet.fr.eu.org> References: <1159289737.11049.261.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060926204433.GA77171@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:19:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1159305562.11049.312.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Maw, 2006-09-26 am 22:44 +0200, ysgrifennodd Olivier Galibert: > > if (probe_ent->irq) > > - probe_ent->irq2 = 15; > > + probe_ent->irq2 = ATA_SECONDARY_IRQ; > > else > > probe_ent->irq = 15; > > Isn't that one supposed to be ATA_SECONDARY_IRQ too? > > > probe_ent->port[1].cmd_addr = ATA_SECONDARY_CMD; Duh yes... (adds another paper bag to the pile)