From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030777AbWJDSeY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:34:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030754AbWJDSeX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:34:23 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:33259 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161256AbWJDSeV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:34:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Industrial device driver uio/uio_* From: Alan Cox To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1157995334.23085.188.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1157995334.23085.188.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:59:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1159988394.25772.97.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-09-11 am 18:22 +0100, ysgrifennodd Alan Cox: > This passed me by while I was away so I only saw it to review in mm6. It > looks like it has a few problems... > And nothing has happened since [Thats Sept 11th] even on the simple bugs although the authors were sent a copy. At this point can the linutronix guys either let me know if they just never got the list of flaws or can we pull the drivers/uio stuff from -mm until its rather better ? I would just NAK it but want to be sure the guys saw the list of problems Alan