From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751124AbWJDVMH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:12:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751135AbWJDVMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:12:06 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:2792 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbWJDVME (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:12:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Industrial device driver uio/uio_* From: Alan Cox To: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH In-Reply-To: <1159990345.1386.277.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1157995334.23085.188.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1159988394.25772.97.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061004121835.bb155afe.akpm@osdl.org> <1159990345.1386.277.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:37:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1159997840.25772.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Mer, 2006-10-04 am 21:32 +0200, ysgrifennodd Thomas Gleixner: > I have no objections, if you pull it from -mm for now. The list of flaws > is accepted and we'll work on this in foreseeable time, _IF_ there is > some basic consensus about the idea itself not being fundamentaly wrong. The device stuff seems ok, the class stuff seems to me overconvoluted but I'd rather someone who knew the class stuff well (Greg thats you) made that decision. Alan