From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161151AbWJKRIw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:08:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161149AbWJKRIw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:08:52 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:63927 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161087AbWJKRIv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:08:51 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 (ext4 problem ?) From: Badari Pulavarty To: Andrew Morton Cc: Theodore Tso , lkml , shaggy@us.ibm.com, ext4 In-Reply-To: <20061011095639.ad8169f7.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20061010000928.9d2d519a.akpm@osdl.org> <452C616D.7040701@us.ibm.com> <20061010210133.dda19d4c.akpm@osdl.org> <1160578934.1447.1.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20061011095639.ad8169f7.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:08:30 -0700 Message-Id: <1160586510.1447.7.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 09:56 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:02:14 -0700 > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 21:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Added the ext4 filesystem. Quick usage instructions: > > > > > > > > > > - Grab updated e2fsprogs from > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs-interim/ > > > > > > > > > ext4 did not survive my simple stress tests. > > > > I ran 4 copies of fsx on ext4dev filesystem (without extents) + > > 4 copies of fsx on ext4dev (with extents). > > > > Machine hung after running for few hours. There are 4 fsx sigsegv > > messages on the console and the last message on the console is > > > > do_IRQ: 0.62 No irq handler for vector > > > > Quite a few people are hitting that - it's related to Eric's recent > IRQ/APIC-routing changes. > > I don't know why that would cause fsx to get a sigsegv though. I don't think they are related. Hopefully once we figure out IRQ problem, we can try to track down fsx problems. Thanks, Badari