From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1160995AbWJKSrX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:47:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161063AbWJKSrX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:47:23 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:18891 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1160995AbWJKSrW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:47:22 -0400 Subject: Re: it821x eats CPU? From: Alan Cox To: Heinz Ulrich Stille Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200610070927.13713.hus@design-d.de> References: <200610070927.13713.hus@design-d.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:13:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1160594021.16513.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Sad, 2006-10-07 am 09:27 +0200, ysgrifennodd Heinz Ulrich Stille: > Looking through the logs I notices that it821x was in "smart" mode, > so I restarted the system with "noraid=1" to get into "pass through". > Now everything is back to normal. A large dd did about 40MB/s without > disturbing other processes. In some configurations the it821x driver was not enabling DMA in smart mode. > Wasn't smart mode the one supposed to be the one reducing CPU load? For RAID1 yes, otherwise not measurably at all.