From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161089AbWJPVAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161087AbWJPVAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0400 Received: from stat9.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.41]:53205 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161084AbWJPVAo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:00:44 -0400 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc2] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: 64-bit DMAcapability fix From: James Bottomley To: "Ju, Seokmann" Cc: Vasily Averin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , devel@openvz.org, Andrey Mirkin In-Reply-To: <890BF3111FB9484E9526987D912B261932E3E8@NAMAIL3.ad.lsil.com> References: <890BF3111FB9484E9526987D912B261932E3E8@NAMAIL3.ad.lsil.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:59:59 -0500 Message-Id: <1161032399.3433.28.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-4.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:37 -0600, Ju, Seokmann wrote: > Hi, > > Er ... this patch would apply in reverse, but what's in the tree > > currently looks to be correct. > No, the patch submitted by Andrey and Vasily should fix the issue. > Without this, driver still claims 64-bit DMA capability for those MegaRAID SATA controllers. Actually ... I found the problem ... the patch is double attached in the email so applying it spits reverse patch applied errors. I've corrected this and put it in the tree. James