From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751249AbWJ3MId (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:08:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751153AbWJ3MId (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:08:33 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:54913 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbWJ3MIc (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:08:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7][PATCH] AMBA DMA: Request for comments. From: Arjan van de Ven To: Peter Pearse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:08:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1162210109.2948.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-7.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 11:57 +0000, Peter Pearse wrote: > The following seven patches against the kernel tag v2.6.19-rc3, are intended > as a basis for discussion of a possible ARM AMBA bus based DMA architecture. > An example implementation for audio playback is given. Hi, a quick question; is this using the generic dma stuff that was added as part of the ioat patches? If not, why not? What is missing in the generic stuff etc etc... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org