From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3-git7: scsi_device_unbusy: inconsistent lock state
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:57:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162220239.2948.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030144315.GG4563@kernel.dk>
> which has always been considered safe, while not very pretty.
actually it's different I think (based on a brief inspection of the
code, I could well be wrong):
get_request_wait() causes a get_request() call with a GFP_NOIO gfp_mask
which perculates upto cfq_set_request() as argument.
cfq_set_request() then calls the inline cfq_get_queue() (which isn't in
the backtrace due to inlining) which does
} else if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
/*
* Inform the allocator of the fact that we will
* just repeat this allocation if it fails, to allow
* the allocator to do whatever it needs to attempt to
* free memory.
*/
spin_unlock_irq(cfqd->queue->queue_lock);
which enables interrupts right smack in the middle of holding a whole
bunch of locks.....
so to me it looks like lockdep at least has the appearance of moaning
about a reasonably fishy situation...
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-30 14:33 Mark Lord
2006-10-30 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 14:57 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-10-30 15:44 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 16:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 16:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 17:52 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-10-30 18:03 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 17:54 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:11 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:30 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:35 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 18:56 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:52 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:59 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 19:04 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:20 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 17:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 17:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162220239.2948.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®