mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3-git7: scsi_device_unbusy: inconsistent lock state
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:57:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162220239.2948.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030144315.GG4563@kernel.dk>


> which has always been considered safe, while not very pretty.


actually it's different I think (based on a brief inspection of the
code, I could well be wrong): 
get_request_wait() causes a get_request() call with a GFP_NOIO gfp_mask
which perculates upto cfq_set_request() as argument.
cfq_set_request() then calls the inline cfq_get_queue() (which isn't in
the backtrace due to inlining) which does
                } else if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
                        /* 
                         * Inform the allocator of the fact that we will
                         * just repeat this allocation if it fails, to allow
                         * the allocator to do whatever it needs to attempt to
                         * free memory.
                         */
                        spin_unlock_irq(cfqd->queue->queue_lock);

which enables interrupts right smack in the middle of holding a whole
bunch of locks.....

so to me it looks like lockdep at least has the appearance of moaning
about a reasonably fishy situation...



-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org



  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-30 14:33 Mark Lord
2006-10-30 14:43 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 14:57   ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-10-30 15:44     ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 16:16       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 16:26         ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 16:31           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 17:52             ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 17:54               ` Ingo Molnar
2006-10-30 18:03                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 17:54               ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:11                 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:16                   ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:30                     ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:35                       ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 18:45                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 18:56                         ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:52                       ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:59                         ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 19:04                           ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-30 18:20                   ` Mark Lord
2006-10-30 17:56               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-30 17:57                 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1162220239.2948.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®