From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753386AbWKCQ7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:59:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753389AbWKCQ7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:59:41 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:23473 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753386AbWKCQ7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:59:40 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,386,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="11284654:sNHT23923233" Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: x86_64 slowdown in lmbench's fork From: Tim Chen Reply-To: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com To: Adrian Bunk Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, discuss@x86-64.org In-Reply-To: <20061103021145.GD13381@stusta.de> References: <1162485897.10806.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1162492453.10806.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061103021145.GD13381@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:10:16 -0800 Message-Id: <1162570216.10806.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 03:11 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > What's your CONFIG_NR_CPUS setting that you are seeing such a big > regression? > CONFIG_NR_CPUS is set to 8. Tim