From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760645AbWLFOZT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:25:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760646AbWLFOZT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:25:19 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44579 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760645AbWLFOZR (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:25:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP From: Arjan van de Ven To: Samuel Thibault Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061206135134.GJ3927@implementation.labri.fr> References: <20061206135134.GJ3927@implementation.labri.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:25:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1165415115.3233.449.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 (2.8.1.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Is there any way to fix this? Glibc people don't seem to want to fix it > on their part, see > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 Hi, Ulrich asked you to go to us once your time travel machine was finished.. is it finished yet ? ;=) this is part of the ABI, so we can't change this in 2006... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org