From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751431AbWLLPhg (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:37:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751432AbWLLPhg (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:37:36 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:48521 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751431AbWLLPhf (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:37:35 -0500 Subject: Re: Support 2.4 modules features in 2.6 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Jaswinder Singh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1165932674.27217.608.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:37:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1165937853.27217.625.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 20:41 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > On 12/12/06, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 19:36 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I want to support old 2.4 modules features in 2.6 kernel modules:- > > > 1. no kernel source tree is required to build modules. > > > > this is a 2.6 not a 2.4 feature btw > > > > Really!! , Please let me know what is the procedure to build the > modules after deleting kernel linux-2.6* you only need include/* for this in 2.6 you can't do this at all with 2.4 kernels, it needs the whole lot. (in both cases the code and headers are needed so that your module can use the data structures and compile in the kernel code you select to use from inlines) > > > > > 2. support modular plugins. > > > > ? > > modular plugins means :- you can still do that. Just you're better off building them in one go; can you give us a pointer to the source of this 2.4 module you have? Maybe some of the mechanisms that you want this for are now very outdated and obsoleted by easier functionality. -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org