mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: knobi@knobisoft.de
Cc: Gleb Natapov <glebn@voltaire.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to detect multi-core and/or HT-enabled CPUs in 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:53:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1167234806.3281.3966.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061227154158.54796.qmail@web32608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


>  
>  this is a real interesting question. Ganglia is coming [originally]
> from the HPC side of computing. At least in the past HT as implemented
> on XEONs did help a lot. Running two CPU+memory-bandwith intensive
> processes on the same physical CPU would at best result in a 50/50
> performance split. So, knowing how many "real" CPUs are in a system is
> interesting to us.

but this 50/50 split is most likely because of either a cache or a
bandwidth bottleneck, at which point "HT" is the wrong measure.

(also if you go to things like SUN's Niagara CPU then it's even more
clear that SMT isn't the right measure for performance capability)


-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-27 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-27 14:16 Martin Knoblauch
2006-12-27 14:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-27 14:40   ` Martin Knoblauch
2006-12-27 15:13     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-27 15:22       ` Gleb Natapov
2006-12-27 15:38         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-27 15:41         ` Martin Knoblauch
2006-12-27 15:53           ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-12-27 15:51         ` Martin Knoblauch
2006-12-27 16:09           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-27 17:14             ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-12-27 17:52             ` Martin Knoblauch
2006-12-27 19:58               ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-12-27 14:37 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1167234806.3281.3966.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=glebn@voltaire.com \
    --cc=knobi@knobisoft.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®