From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: kalash nainwal <nirvana.code@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wake_up() takes long time to return
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:47:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1169304446.3055.764.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e92e3a770701200224n42c948d5oe75aa5eb907e9786@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:54 +0530, kalash nainwal wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We've a kernel (n/w) module, which sits over ethernet. Whenever a pkt
> is received (in softirq), after doing some minimal processing,
> wake_up() is called to wake up another kernel thread which does rest
> (bulk) of the processing.
>
> We notice that this wake_up() call is sometimes taking as long as 48
> milli-seconds to return. This happens around 10 times out of 10M. We
> earlier thought its possibly because of the contention on rq->lock,
> but we see the same phenomenon even on a uniprocessor box. So obviosly
> thats not the case.
>
> We can't figure out any other reason for wake_up() to take this much
> time? As this call comes directly in our (receive) hotpath, we're very
> concerned. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hi,
unfortunately you didn't provide your driver code or a link to it, so
people who want to help you would have to guess in the dark... could you
reply to this email with the pointer to the code?
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-20 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-20 10:24 kalash nainwal
2007-01-20 14:47 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2007-01-22 9:26 ` kalash nainwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1169304446.3055.764.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirvana.code@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®