From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030247AbXAaR2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:28:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030340AbXAaR2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:28:38 -0500 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:51588 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030247AbXAaR2h (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:28:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/23] clocksource: increase initcall priority From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Daniel Walker Cc: Ingo Molnar , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <1170264052.9781.130.camel@imap.mvista.com> References: <20070131033710.420168478@mvista.com> <20070131033807.427331295@mvista.com> <20070131115055.GD1847@elte.hu> <1170261775.9781.100.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070131171042.GB4468@elte.hu> <1170264052.9781.130.camel@imap.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:29:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1170264566.29240.191.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:20 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > The purpose of clocksource_initcall is so the initcall can be increased > without changing all the individual clocksources .. So I have to > disconnect that from the acpi_pm because it can't tolerate it. Each clocksource has to decide on its own, when the registration is done. ARM clocksources register in the timer init, pm timer needs to wait. So what exactly is solved by an extra initcall ? tglx