From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751262AbXCCI2s (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:28:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751255AbXCCI2s (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:28:48 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:43435 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbXCCI2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:28:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Optional TX/RX path optimized for SMP From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andi Kleen Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann , Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Stefan Roscher In-Reply-To: References: <200702231730.58579.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:28:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1172910508.8184.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 04:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Jan-Bernd Themann writes: > > > > Are there any concerns about this approach? > > Yes. You should fix the NAPI code instead of trying to work > around it. NAPI is being fixed but the fix will take time to get in. In the meantime, the solution to get something working is the workaround. Ben.