From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934094AbXCVQ0L (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:26:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934108AbXCVQ0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:26:10 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:50775 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934094AbXCVQ0J (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:26:09 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 From: David Woodhouse To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070322114144.GA29453@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20070319205623.299d0378.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070320103151.f65c81b6.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070320192016.GC22797@outflux.net> <20070320214714.0e584cd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070321115955.GA18195@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1174555020.20505.89.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070322114144.GA29453@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:25:53 +0000 Message-Id: <1174580753.20505.120.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:41 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Yep - realized this when I took a closer look. > One thing striked my mind. It is correct that new things gets added > to i386 first these days? Personally I tend to do PowerPC first, but most others seem to do i386, yes. There are still system calls being added to i386 and not x86_64... init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented init/missing_syscalls.h:953:3: warning: #warning syscall lutimesat not implemented init/missing_syscalls.h:956:3: warning: #warning syscall revokeat not implemented init/missing_syscalls.h:959:3: warning: #warning syscall frevoke not implemented > To me it looks like x86_64 is growing larger than i386 among the > developers these days so using asm-x86_64/unistd.h could be a better > choice? Or perhaps the union of i386, x86_64 and powerpc. But I think i386 is good enough for now. -- dwmw2