From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xin Zhao <uszhaoxin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux page cache issue?
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:10:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175091028.12882.15.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ae3c140703272345y3b3cb3cexf4c4b63e0035d5b9@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 02:45 -0400, Xin Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If a Linux process opens and reads a file A, then it closes the file.
> Will Linux keep the file A's data in cache for a while in case another
> process opens and reads the same in a short time? I think that is what
> I heard before.
Yes.
> But after I digged into the kernel code, I am confused.
>
> When a process closes the file A, iput() will be called, which in turn
> calls the follows two functions:
> iput_final()->generic_drop_inode()
A comment from the top of fs/dcache.c:
/*
* Notes on the allocation strategy:
*
* The dcache is a master of the icache - whenever a dcache entry
* exists, the inode will always exist. "iput()" is done either when
* the dcache entry is deleted or garbage collected.
*/
Basically, as long a a dentry is present, iput_final won't be called on
the inode.
> But from the following calling chain, we can see that file close will
> eventually lead to evict and free all cached pages. Actually in
> truncate_complete_page(), the pages will be freed. This seems to
> imply that Linux has to re-read the same data from disk even if
> another process B read the same file right after process A closes the
> file. That does not make sense to me.
>
> /***calling chain ***/
> generic_delete_inode/generic_forget_inode()->
> truncate_inode_pages()->truncate_inode_pages_range()->
> truncate_complete_page()->remove_from_page_cache()->
> __remove_from_page_cache()->radix_tree_delete()
>
> Am I missing something? Can someone please provide some advise?
>
> Thanks a lot
> -x
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-28 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-28 6:45 Xin Zhao
2007-03-28 7:35 ` junjie cai
2007-03-28 7:38 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2007-03-28 14:10 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2007-03-28 15:39 ` Xin Zhao
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.0.83.0703281157010.2527@sigma.j-a-k-j.com>
2007-03-28 16:15 ` Xin Zhao
2007-03-29 9:27 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-29 14:41 ` Xin Zhao
2007-04-02 12:51 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1175091028.12882.15.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com \
--to=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uszhaoxin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®