From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767400AbXDEW76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:59:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767403AbXDEW76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:59:58 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49187 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767400AbXDEW75 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:59:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers; optionally. From: David Woodhouse To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Alan Cox , Brad Boyer , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <17941.32261.914571.136583@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1175610345.2665.15.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17938.57292.870224.132415@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175642916.10567.24.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070403212928.GA12951@cynthia.pants.nu> <20070404022544.59b022a6@the-village.bc.nu> <17939.10130.687893.167511@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175663999.2932.8.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17939.15726.114059.679277@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175666635.2932.17.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17939.17962.248566.886449@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175696383.2774.24.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17940.14667.503535.507564@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175777154.2719.14.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17941.32261.914571.136583@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:59:19 -0400 Message-Id: <1175813960.2764.21.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 (2.10.0-10.fc7.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:53 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Why would the numbers be prone to change, any more than they are > already? Because now 8250 ports can actually coexist with Zilog ports. Before my fix, it was strictly one or the other. -- dwmw2