From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946090AbXDLJv5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:51:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945994AbXDLJtG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:49:06 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.192.81]:62789 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946009AbXDLJsm (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:48:42 -0400 Subject: Re: sched_yield proposals/rationale From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich To: Buytaert_Steven@emc.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <585DC2133F7C974F87D4EC432896F1720309F1EA@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com> References: <585DC2133F7C974F87D4EC432896F1720309F1EA@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Big Corporation Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:48:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1176371319.3975.19.camel@sx.thebigcorporation.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 04:31 -0400, Buytaert_Steven@emc.com wrote: > Since the new 2.6.x O(1) scheduler I'm having latency problems. 1. Have you elevated the process priority? 2. Have you tried running SCHED_FIFO, or SCHED_RR?