From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030241AbXDMWOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:14:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030468AbXDMWOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:14:47 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:47490 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030241AbXDMWOq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:14:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [NFS] Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.) From: Trond Myklebust To: Mike Snitzer Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, NeilBrown , Andrew Morton , Roland Dreier , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20704131347u4a28b5d1h1959227980449fbf@mail.gmail.com> References: <170fa0d20704131347u4a28b5d1h1959227980449fbf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:14:25 -0400 Message-Id: <1176502465.6394.26.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.1, required=12.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.065) X-UiO-Scanned: 62A4992B85F25E5739BB3EEA56FF884F537D8024 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 276 total 1053687 max/h 7466 blacklist 0 greylist 1 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:47 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the > core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport > Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in mainline. Could > you, or others, please clarify the plan for merging RPC/RDMA? That would be a question for the actual RPC/RDMA developers (i.e. James Lentini and Tom Talpey). They haven't submitted any code for review yet. > Do you mean the NFS/RDMA server code from Tom Tucker of Open Grid > Computing? Why wouldn't this code be included? That too has never been submitted for review AFAIK. Why would we include it? Cheers Trond