From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752223AbXDOIpP@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752223AbXDOIpP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:45:15 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752414AbXDOIpO
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:45:14 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58519 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1752223AbXDOIpN (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:45:13 -0400
X-Authenticated: #14349625
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18v70JVIrov+wg8Tiyv2wxJjrW6sFKV/xWwGMXbTw
	LaNlLLVf3JUe9s
Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair
	Scheduler [CFS]
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20070415083616.GA29878@gnuppy.monkey.org>
References: <20070413202100.GA9957@elte.hu>
	 <200704151327.13589.kernel@kolivas.org>
	 <1176619384.6222.70.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
	 <20070415083616.GA29878@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:45:09 +0200
Message-Id: <1176626709.30350.62.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 01:36 -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:43:04AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> > Demystify what?   The casual observer need only read either your attempt
> 
> Here's the problem. You're a casual observer and obviously not paying
> attention.
> 
> > at writing a scheduler, or my attempts at fixing the one we have, to see
> > that it was high time for someone with the necessary skills to step in.
> > Now progress can happen, which was _not_ happening before.
> 
> I think that's inaccurate and there are plenty of folks that have that
> technical skill and background. The scheduler code isn't a deep mystery
> and there are plenty of good kernel hackers out here across many
> communities.  Ingo isn't the only person on this planet to have deep
> scheduler knowledge.

Ok <shrug>, I'm not paying attention, and you can't read.  We're even.
Have a nice life.

	-Mike