From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753803AbXDWIRG (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:17:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753907AbXDWIRG (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:17:06 -0400 Received: from 65-117-135-114.dia.static.qwest.net ([65.117.135.114]:54198 "EHLO postfix.timesys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753803AbXDWIRE (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:17:04 -0400 Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT: 2.6.20-rt8 patch tweaked for 2.6.20.7 From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@timesys.com To: John Sigler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu In-Reply-To: <462C6863.2050003@free.fr> References: <4628BD0E.3040206@free.fr> <1177311677.30986.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <462C6863.2050003@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:18:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1177316315.30986.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:03 +0200, John Sigler wrote: > > Can you create an entry in the rt-wiki, so people can find your > > patches ? > > Sure. > > Should I add a link to my patch on the "CONFIG PREEMPT RT Patch" page? > http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Download > > e.g. in the "Download" section, something along the lines of: > > "An updated version of the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT patch (cleanly applies to > kernel 2.6.20.7) is also available." Yep, that's fine. > I should probably mention that is not an officially sanctioned version, > and that it has not received the same scrutiny as other patches? :) tglx