From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1030468AbXD1EUw@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030468AbXD1EUw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:20:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030580AbXD1EUw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:20:52 -0400
Received: from nwd2mail10.analog.com ([137.71.25.55]:45299 "EHLO
	nwd2mail10.analog.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1030468AbXD1EUv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:20:51 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,463,1170651600"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="36730952:sNHT22608838"
Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
From: Bryan WU <bryan.wu@analog.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
       Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
       Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
       Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
In-Reply-To: <20070427151314.GA10281@suse.de>
References: <20070426165445.GA1898@kroah.com>
	 <1177668954.5969.18.camel@roc-desktop>  <20070427151314.GA10281@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:21:24 +0800
Message-Id: <1177734084.9029.10.camel@roc-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > 
> > You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> > long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. 
> 
> Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
> releases :)
> 

Yeah, but we are the vendor as you mentioned. -:))

If we wanna to release a kernel to customer product development, how to
choose the stable version? Currently, we always followed the kernel
release cycle/rules and give customer the latest stable version.

Thank you Greg
-Bryan